|
HOME PAGE
Question 3: What are the greatest problems in the New Churches?
Answer:
There are many problems but all of them are normal problems in a spiritual church without the function of Benjamin. A spiritual church always receives influx from the deeper hells and without influx from the higher heavens declines because it cannot resist those hells. The present New Church organizations are so contaminated that nearly all influx from heaven has been mixed with infernal influx. Only rational influx and spiritual-moral influx from the lower heavens prevail. Of course this does not apply to some individual members who think independently outside of organizations.
Swedenborg himself wrote (Apocalypse Explained, 764): “that the woman fled into the wilderness where she hath a place prepared by God, and afterwards that she obtained the wings of an eagle, and flew to her own place, and this signifies that the church which is called the New Jerusalem is to tarry among those who are in the doctrine of faith separated from charity while it grows to fullness, until, provision is made for it among many. But in that church there are dragons who separate faith from good works, not only in doctrine, but also in life; the rest in the same church, who live the life of faith, which is charity, are not dragons, although among them…. But what and how crafty and even pernicious are the reasonings of those meant by the dragon about separation of faith from good works, and their conjunction - the Lord being willing – will be revealed elsewhere…. those reasonings exist only with the learned leaders of the church, and are unknown to the people of the church.”
But Swedenborg did not reveal those pernicious reasonings he mentioned (maybe there were in the missing portion of the Coronis) and that is why I am trying to do it here.
I examined Swedenborgian organizations in Great Britain and in Sweden in 1977-1979. A friend of mine did the same in the USA in 1988-1990. Later I have examined web sites of those organizations.
I have found at least six principal ways of infernal influx into the New Church:
1. The notion that Swedenborg’s theological works have an inner meaning, that is, they are a part of the Word or “the Third Testament”.
2. The notion that Swedenborg is only one of the great mystics like Jacob Lorber or others.
3. The ignorance of the mechanism of temptations.
4. The ignorance of the danger menacing to the whole mankind, that is to say, the infernal influx from the Jewish hells, that is, the hells opposite the spiritual-celestial heaven.
5. The imitation of the Dragonistic Church in the outer form of the Divine Service and in social life.
6. The notion that the results of present day atheistic and materialistic sciences are more genuine than the heavenly Doctrine or some Swedenborg’s philosophical works. For example, the theories of relativity against Swedenborg’s theory of the ether or the third element of the world (Principia) and believing in the systematic cover-up of the results of the space and the moon research against Swedenborg’s work Earths in the Universe. New Church people have not noticed sufficiently the impact of the atheistic and materialistic philosophy of sciences prevailing in the universities and producing many kinds of false theories and doctrines such as the assumption that man is a descendant of apes.
I shall treat these questions one at a time.
1. There is no other purpose in Swedenborg’s theological Writings than to understand intellectually the spiritual sense of the Word. Swedenborg’s Writings opens the human understanding to perceive the internal meaning in a rationally way, that is, their function is to explain. So they cannot be a part of the Divine Word but they are the Explanation of the Divine Word: “Nunc licet intellectualiter intrare in arcana fidei.” (Now it is permitted to intellectually penetrate into the secrets of faith). If somebody will see something celestial in the Writings, it is just this: do live according to them! Swedenborg’s Writings are the Divine Revelation about the Divine Word but not a part of the Word itself. The explanation or the revelation is an outside consultant but not the subject itself.
2. There are many mystics who are men or women who have tried to understand religious things from their own understanding or from messages from the spiritual world. Emanuel Swedenborg is the only one (after the Prophets of course) who has got the revelation from the Only God Himself. To mingle messages or other information, which is not from the Divine, with the Divine Revelation is a sin against the sixth Commandment. I have read some works of Jacob Lorber and of some other mystics and found them to be worthless and originated from one’s own intelligence, that is, from hell.
3. According to Swedenborg temptations are the only way to be reformed or regenerated. When I visited Great Britain and Sweden, I asked ministers and members about temptations, but nobody could tell me about them. The word temptation itself was not understood. And however, the temptations are the only way to be regenerated and is allowed only to the members of the Holy Jerusalem (the New Jerusalem, the New Church, the Tabernacle of God, the New Bethlehem or by whatever name we call it). People of other religions cannot stand temptations. With the temptations the member of the New Church can be in direct touch with the Lord Himself and this has never happened in the whole history of Churches. This is a unique privilege for the New Church members. Even celestial churches have been connected with the Lord only by means of angels. That the Lord is more present with us while we are in temptations than we are out of temptation also is a secret: This Holy Jerusalem is eternal and can be destroyed never but man has to do his own share in the process of regeneration. That is why the knowledge of temptations is the chief knowledge of what a New Church minister can teach in addition to the Doctrine itself. And a priestly minister cannot teach about temptations if he has not himself undergone temptations. The spiritual temptations are not sufficient for a minister of the New Church because a minister must have ability to grasp influx from the deeper hells, that is, a minister must have undergone spiritual-celestial or celestial temptations or sufferings. There are many principles of temptation explained in the Writings but there cannot appear actual examples of the temptations of the present people and only by understanding these one apprehends what temptations really are. The present people are of different genius compared with the people of old or even of Swedenborg’s time. A secret arises from the fact that the New Church is an eternal marriage of the Lord and the Church on the earth and the man of this Church ought to love the Lord actually more than himself in order to find out the secrets of temptations and to overcome them. The Writings are not enough to understand the mechanism of temptations. But about this I will discuss later in the Question six.
4. Despite the fact that Swedenborg disclosed much of the infernal nature of the Jewish religion this is not noticed in Swedenborgian organizations except in Finland. This question is of the utmost theological importance for the reason that the Lord Himself was born into the Jewish religion and showed its infernal nature: “You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. But because I tell the truth, you do not believe Me.” (John 8: 44, 45). The present-day Jews have the same infernal religion, the Talmud (The Talmud is a written continuation of the tradition of the elders against which Jesus taught and which he called the leaven of the Pharisees), as in early times but they are now much stronger because a very strong and filthy nation, the Khazars, adopted the Talmudism in the eighth century (see: http://www.ark-of-salvation.org/khazars.htm ). Over 90 % of the World’s Jews today are descendants of the Khazars and the State of Israel is in fact a Khazarian State. I am not a racist and do not accept any kind of racism and that is why I do not accept Zionism and the Talmud which are the worst sort of racism on our planet. Zionism is a political doctrine based on the Talmud. The leading Jews in Israel and in other countries are the cruellest and boldest racists whose highest delight is to dominate, destroy and injure other peoples and especially Christians. I am sure that over 90 % of ordinary Jews or Khazars are just normal people like Finns, Englishmen, Frenchmen and others. Only the Zionist leaders and the leading Jewish Intelligentsia are those beasts who enormously have injured mankind. I shall discuss this matter more in the next question but now I will disclose the spiritual function of the Jewish religion because this is the greatest menace to the existence of mankind.
Swedenborg wrote (Word Explained, 1712): “That Jacob was he who was cast down from heaven; and consequently that very serpent which would bruise the heel of God Messiah. If such is the case, then in this sense all the words that precede verses 11 and 12 must be said to apply to Jacob’s posterity as to the serpent himself. But for myself, it is abhorrent to say this, or to write these words. Therefore they must be said by those who are permitted thus to bring them in.” The verses of the Bible Swedenborg mentioned here are these: ”Also God said to him: ’I am God Almighty. Be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall proceed from you, and kings shall come from your body. The land which I gave Abraham and Isaac I give to you; and to your descendants after you I give this land.’” (Genesis 35: 11, 12). In Genesis Jacob signifies the Devil and Israel God (Word Explained, 1714) and here Swedenborg prophesies the birth of the State of Israel as a state of the Devil. This is really abhorrent and I feel that it is my duty to bring them in or disclose the Jews’ spiritual role on our planet. I can do it because I am not afraid of the Jews. The Jews have tried to injure me several times but without success. The Lord Himself protects me and that is where my courage comes from.
That the Jewish religion is infernal and threat to the existence of mankind come clearly out of the following review about the book Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years by Israel Shahak, with a foreword by Gore Vidal, published by Pluto Press (London, 1994). An online version of the book: http://abbc2.com/islam/english/books/jewhis/jewhis1.htm
Professor Israel Shahak is an Israeli citizen, former concentration camp inmate during the WW II, and the founder of Israel’s Human Rights League. This book by him about Jewish hatred and contempt toward Gentiles is highly recommended.
Book review by Gore Vidal:
When the Roman historian Tacitus pointed out 19 centuries ago that the Jews are unique among the peoples of the world in their intense hatred and contempt for all peoples but their own, he was only repeating what many other scholars had discovered before him. For the next 1,900 years other investigators came to similar conclusions, either from a study of the Jews’ religious writings or from a study of the Jews’ behaviour toward non-Jews.
Notable among these was the reformer, Martin Luther, who in 1543 wrote in “Von den Juden und aus Ihren Lügen”:
“Does not their Talmud say, and do not their rabbis write, that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob, as they do with their usury, from a heathen is a divine service. For they hold that they cannot be too hard on us nor sin against us, because they are of the noble blood and circumcised saints; we, however, are cursed goyim. And they are the masters of the world, and we are their servants, yea, their cattle...
Should someone think that I am saying too much, I am not saying too much, but much too little. For I see in their writings how they curse us goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and their prayers.”
The Jews responded to Luther like they responded to all the others. They put him down as just another ”hater,” blinded by religious bigotry. And today that’s still the Jews’ standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about them except the most fawning praise.
When British newsman William Cash, Los Angeles correspondent for London’s Daily Telegraph, reported late last year in a magazine article the simple fact that the executives in Hollywood’s motion picture industry are nearly all Jews, they shrieked at him, “Hater!” and denied his fact. When famous actor Marlon Brando later repeated the same fact, he was as well attacked for being “anti-Semite”.
Thus, Israel Shahak’s book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3,000 Years” is all the more important for being a document by a acknowledgeable Jew -- a Jewish ”insider” -- about the beliefs and behaviour of his fellow Jews. Born in Warsaw in 1933, Shahak spent a portion of his childhood in the concentration camp in Belsen, from which he immigrated to Palestine in 1945. He grew up in Israel, served in the Israeli military, and became a chemistry professor. Like all Israelis, he became fluent in Hebrew. He also became acclimated to the peculiar moral atmosphere of Israeli society: a combination of overweening arrogance and deceit, a mixture of pugnacious self-righteousness and duplicity.
Unlike his fellow Israelis, however, Professor Shahak is deeply troubled by this peculiar atmosphere. Whereas the Jews around him take it for granted that the goyim on whom they depend for economic, military, and diplomatic support are too stupid ever to figure out what the Jews think about them and say about them behind their backs and plan to do to them when they can, and too sheep like ever to take effective action if they do figure it out, he worries. He remembers that the Romans figured it out, and they consequently sacked Jerusalem and ended their cult in Palestine. He remembers that the Germans figured it out, and that’s why he became an involuntary tenant in a concentration camp. He’s worried that if his fellow Jews continue behaving as they always have, they will get themselves into some really serious trouble -- again.
In particular, Professor Shahak is concerned about the behaviour of those of his people who adhere to “Judaism”. He is not one of these himself, and so he is able to look with some degree of objectivity at the mixture of superstition, Jewish chauvinism, and hatred of non-Jews which makes up the Jewish religion and its sacred writings. He deplores traditional Jewish teachings, not only because of the danger that some new Martin Luther will come along and spill the beans to the Gentiles, but because of the spiritually debilitating effect these teachings have had on the Jews themselves. Of the world of medieval Jewry in Europe, the world of the ghetto and the shtetl which modern Jewish writers refer to in euphoric tones as a world of quaint tradition and piety, Shahak says: “It was a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance ...”
He cites a number of specific instances of the ways in which Jewish religious authorities have kept their flocks under control. In general, the rabbis have taught their fellow Jews that their Gentile neighbours are spiritually and morally unclean; that they are subhuman, on a level with the beasts of the field; and that they hate Jews and must be hated in return. Jews are taught that the Christian religion is a religion fit only for animals, and that its founder, Jesus, was the son of a prostitute and is presently immersed in a pit of boiling excrement in hell.
Among the Hassidim (Hebrew for “pious ones”) all of these teachings are kept current. Shahak points out that a central thesis of the Hassidic doctrine is that only Jews are human beings, and that the universe was created for them alone. Non-Jews were created only to be used by Jews. Although this teaching about the subhumanity of Gentiles is most open and explicit among the bearded, sidelocked, black-hatted Orthodox Jews that one sees in Jewish strongholds such as New York City, it comes from the core of Jewish tradition and is accepted to a greater or lesser degree by all pious Jews. It is, for example, a specific tenet of the Jewish Defense League and is cited in the membership handbook for that group.
Especially frustrating to Professor Shahak is the clever deception which his fellow Jews use to conceal the true nature of Judaism from their Gentile neighbours. Regarding the veil of false piety which conceals from Gentile eyes the malevolent doctrine of the Hassidim, he writes: “A chief deceiver in this case, and a good example of the power of deception, was Martin Buber. His numerous works eulogizing the whole Hassidic movement (including Habbad) never so much as hint at the real doctrines of Hassidism concerning non-Jews.” Buber (1878-1965) promoted Hassidism in Germany during the rise of the National Socialists -- in fact, until 1938, when he left for Palestine -- and Shahak considers Buber’s efforts, despite their deceptiveness, at least partly responsible for the National Socialist reaction to the Jews.
Another example of Jewish deception given by Professor Shahak concerns the etymology of the Yiddish word for a Gentile girl, shiksa. He cites the popular English-language book “The Joys of Yiddish” (New York, 1968), by Leo Rosten, which tells its readers that shiksa comes from the Hebrew word sheqetz, meaning “blemish”. Shahak writes: “This is a barefaced lie, as every speaker of Hebrew knows. The Megiddo Modern Hebrew-English Dictionary, published in Israel, correctly defines sheqetz as follows: ‘unclean animal; loathsome creature, abomination...’“
Professor Shahak writes with passion. He evidently feels that liberating Jews everywhere from the shackles of their misanthropic superstitions and freeing Israeli state policy in particular from the stifling influence of Judaism is a matter of some urgency. He focuses our attention especially on the inherent hatefulness of Judaism with citations from a number of Jewish religious writings.
In a chapter titled “The Laws against Non-Jews,” he writes:
“...The Halakhah, that is the legal system of classical Judaism -- as practiced by practically all Jews from the 9th century to the end of the 18th and as maintained to this very day in the form of Orthodox Judaism -- is based primarily on the Babylonian Talmud. However, because of the unwieldy complexity of the legal disputations recorded in the Talmud, more manageable codifications of Talmudic law became necessary ... The most authoritative code, widely used to date as a handbook, is the Shulhan Arukh...”
He then cites the teaching of this code regarding homicide:
”According to the Jewish religion, the murder of a Jew is a capital offence and one of the three most heinous sins (the other two being idolatry and adultery). Jewish religious courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish, even beyond the limits of the ordinary administration of justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew ... When the victim is a Gentile, the position is quite different. A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court. To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all.”
”Thus, one of the two most important commentators on the Shulhan Arukh explains that when it comes to a Gentile, “one must not lift one’s hand to harm him, but one may harm him indirectly, for instance by removing a ladder after he had fallen into a crevice ... there is no prohibition here, because it was not done directly.” ...
“A Gentile murderer who happens to be under Jewish jurisdiction must be executed whether the victim was Jewish or not. However, if the victim was Gentile and the murderer converts to Judaism, he is not punished.”
Then Shahak gives us a rabbi’s answer to an Israeli soldier who has asked whether or not it is proper to kill Arab women and children. In his answer the rabbi quotes from the Talmud: “The best of the Gentiles -- kill him; the best of snakes -- dash out its brains.”
Perhaps even more offensive are the Jewish beliefs on sexual matters. Shahak writes:
“Sexual intercourse between a married Jewish woman and any man other than her husband is a capital offence for both parties, and one of the three most heinous sins. The status of Gentile women is very different. The Halakhah presumes all Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous and the verse ‘whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue [of semen] is like the issue of horses’ is applied to them... Therefore, the concept of adultery does not apply to intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman; rather the Talmud equates such intercourse to the sin of bestiality...
According to the Talmudic Encyclopaedia: He who has carnal knowledge of the wife of a Gentile is not liable to the death penalty, for it is written: ‘thy fellow’s wife’ rather than the alien’s wife ... and although a married Gentile woman is forbidden to the Gentiles, in any case a Jew is exempted.”
“This does not imply that sexual intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman is permitted -- quite the contrary. But the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even if she was raped by the Jew: ‘If a Jew has coitus with a Gentile woman, whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or unmarried, and even if he is a minor aged only nine years and one day -- because he had wilful coitus with her she must be killed, as is the case with a beast, because through her a Jew got into trouble.’”
The Talmud’s overriding concern with matters of money and property mirror that of the Jews and Professor Shahak offers a number of hair-splitting examples of Jewish beliefs on the subject and the way in which distinctions are made between the property of Jews and Gentiles, and between Jewish dealings with another Jew and with a Gentile. Two of these examples will suffice here:
“If a Jew finds property whose probable owner is Jewish, the finder is strictly enjoined to make a positive effort to return his find by advertising it publicly. In contrast, the Talmud and all the early rabbinical authorities not only allow a Jewish finder to appropriate an article lost by a Gentile, but actually forbid him or her to return it”...
”It is forbidden to defraud a Jew by selling or buying at an unreasonable price. However, “fraud does not apply to Gentiles, for it is written: ‘Do not defraud each man his brother.’”
Shahak points out that “the Halakhah interprets all such idioms as ‘each man his brother’ or ‘neighbour’ as referring exclusively to one’s fellow Jew.”
How have the Jews managed to keep teachings of this sort concealed from the Gentiles among whom they live? The truth of the matter is that they have not always been able to do so. Luther was not the only Christian scholar who learned Hebrew, peered into the Talmud, and was horrified by what he saw. Sometimes the Jews were able to bribe the Christian authorities to overlook such things, but throughout the later Middle Ages there were prohibitions and burnings of Talmudic literature by outraged popes and bishops. The Jews developed a clever system of double bookkeeping to circumvent such “persecution”. They modified or deleted the offending passages from new editions of the Talmud, and they made up a separate compendium -- Talmudic Omissions, or in Hebrew Hesronot Shas -- which circulated surreptitiously among the rabbis. In Israel today, feeling cocky enough to dispense with most such deceptions, the Jews are putting the passages which formerly had been omitted or modified back into the latest editions of the Talmud or the Shulhan Arukh in their original form. They are still careful with translations into Gentile tongues, however. Professor Shahak gives an example:
“In 1962 a part of the Maimonidean Code ... the so-called Book of Knowledge, which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text. The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: ‘It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands’. In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: ‘It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.’ But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of ‘infidels’ who must be exterminated: ‘Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoqand Baitos [the founders of the Sadducean sect] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot.’ Not one word of this appears in the English text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.”
Israel Shahak is a rare Jew indeed, and his book is essential reading for anyone interested in the problem of the Jews and of the Jewish religion. It opens everybody’s eyes to see the real nature of the Jewish religion.
Another famous Jew disclosing the infernal nature of the Jewish religion is Benjamin Freedman. Benjamin Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.
Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over the USA. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. Mr. Freedman’s book about the Khazars (The Truth About Khazars, New York, 1954). Benjamin Freedman’s speech at the Willard Hotel in 1961 also is worth of reading because it shows how the Jews or Khazars were behind the First and Second World War and may be behind the Third.
I must disclose for the New Church this secret: The spiritual-celestial heaven is the opposite of the Jewish hells (A wicked and adulterous generation, Matthew 16:4) and that is why the Jews have a special religious role on our planet. The Jews can cheat the spiritual and natural man but not the spiritual-celestial man. The Jewish power on our planet rises out of this reason. That is why the Lord Himself was born as a spiritual-celestial man and that is why the New Church cannot become a Wife of the Lord without Benjamin. The Jewish religion try to conjoin evil to truths and untruths to good and this is a horrible sin, a blasphemy. The David’s star symbolizes this conjunction: a triangle with the tip upwards conjoined to a triangle with the tip downwards signifies an attempt to conjoin the heavens to the hells which is the most serious sin in the whole universe. The Jews (not all of course) hate Christians and their goal is to destroy the whole Christendom according to Talmud. The Jews have insinuated an adulterous atmosphere into the whole world by their Media Mafia and especially by the film industry in Hollywood which is totally dominated by them. The New Church with other anti-Zionist movements, and especially the Jewish anti-Zionists, and Islam are the only power which can together put down this Jewish infernal influence by the Secret Jewish World Government, that is, the Jewish International Intelligentsia, and rescue the whole planet from this terrible threat. One can compare American films in the early fifties with our days’ and can see an enormous increase of sex, violence and adulterous atmosphere which poisons our young and adult people especially in the western countries.
The Talmudic religion and the Zionism are the worst kind of racism and the worst threat to mankind’s existence. The duty of the New Jerusalem is to participate in the crushing of these Devil’s weapons. This procedure is one of the highest forms of Charity on our planet.
In 1986 Mordechai Vanunu who had been a technician at the Dimona nuclear plant in Israel 1976-1985, talked to a London newspaper, the Sunday Times, about the Dimona plant, revealing that Israel had enough weapons-grade plutonium to arm 150 nuclear and thermo-nuclear devices. He also confirmed that the Israelis had helped South Africa detonate a nuclear device in September 1979. Soon after the resulting article appeared, Vanunu went missing. It later transpired that he had been lured from London to Rome by Israel’s Secret Service, the Mossad, kidnapped there and returned to Israel by clandestine means for trial on charges of espionage and treason. The trial opened in August 1987 under a blanket of secrecy and the following march he was sentenced to 19 years’ imprisonment. In reality all that was only a theater. Vanunu was an agent of the Mossad and his task was to mask the real nuclear capacity of Israel. Vanunu is not spending time in jail but is living luxuriously in a small town in Israel. The fact is that in 1986 Israel had over 500 nuclear weapons, also many hydrogen bombs. After that Israel has become the leading nuclear power on our planet because it has today more neutron bombs than U.S.A., Russia or China. A neutron bomb can destroy all life within the globe with radius of tens of kilometres. It should be noted that the Mossad uses “anti-Zionists” and “anti-Semites” for Israel’s purposes to infiltrate organizations which are working against Israel and Zionism. Therefore a person with strong opinions against Israel and Zionist can be one agent of the Mossad whose duty is to uncover Zionists’ enemies.
5. The imitation of the Dragonistic Church in the outer form of the Divine Service and in social life.
When I visited Great Britain and Sweden I could notice how the Swedenborgians imitated old Churches in the forms of the Divine Service and even in the forms of Church buildings. There were no correct correspondences in those buildings but only imitations of the old (Catholic, Protestant, Anglican etc.) Christian churches. There was often a cross on the tower of the church which signified that this Church was under temptations. A correct symbol should be a crown, that is, a victory from temptations. Of course the cross is a correct symbol if we understand present Swedenborgian Churches as Dragonistic. Also the Divine Service simulated the system of the old churches although the three sacraments (Baptism, Holy Supper and Marriage Ceremony) were almost correctly performed.
Revelation 21: 22: “And I saw no temple therein; for the Lord God Almighty is the temple of it, and the Lamb”. Swedenborg wrote that this ”signifies that in this church there will not be any external separated from the internal, because the Lord Himself in His Divine Human, from whom is the all of the church is alone approached, worshiped, and adored. By ‘I saw no temple therein’ is not meant that in the New Church, which is the New Jerusalem, there will not be temples, but in it there will not be an external separated from the internal; the reason is because by ‘a temple’ is signified the church as to worship, and, in the highest sense, the Lord Himself as to the Divine Human, who is to be worshiped; see above (n. 191, 529, 585); and since the all of the church is from the Lord, therefore it is said, ‘for the Lord God Almighty is the temple of it, and the Lamb’ by which is signified the Lord in His Divine Human; by ‘the Lord God Almighty’ is meant the Lord from eternity who is Jehovah Himself, and by ’the Lamb’ is signified His Divine Human, as has been frequently stated above.”(Apocalypse Revealed, 918).
Regardless of what Swedenborg is telling here ”that is not meant that in the New Jerusalem there will not be temples”, there ought not to be temples without correct correspondences. Man himself is a temple in the internal worship but the sacraments demand a building or a place. This is a possible future challenge to the regenerated Swedenborgian architects.
That “in it there will not be an external separated from the internal”. The Holy Jerusalem is an internal Church with Internal Divine Service (this is explained in Question five), that is, to recognize the Divine Human in Jesus, to live according to the Decalogue as the Doctrine of the New Jerusalem teaches (One can find the best explanations in The Apocalypse Explained in the parts Continuation from 934-1028 and in The True Christian Religion, Chapter V, see DECALOGUE), to pray often and to read often the Word and the Writings in addition to meditating spiritually. This also means that a real member of the Lord’s Holy Jerusalem cannot live the exactly same kind of social life as an unregenerated. When one is regenerated his order is reversed compared with the unregenerated. With the unregenerated the material and sensuous things, that is, the love to the self and to the world are the head and with the regenerated the love to the Lord and Charity are in the first place. This means that the social life also differs with these two kinds of people and when they meet one another their spirits who are near by also meet and this is a cause of many kinds of conflicts which are very difficult to discern and to understand. Now the present New Church people imitate the social life of the unregenerated and are not prepared to behave correctly according to the Heavenly Doctrine. It is a duty of the New Church priests to teach in these questions. But how this ought to be happen is a very complicated subject and is to be treated in the following questions. Here I only mention the following.
If one compares the present-day television programs, films, novels and the customs of people with the same in the early fifties one can discern a very great difference: sex, violence and many kind of abnormalities and perversities have increased enormously. Murders, rapes, open sex and insane violence are the most popular themes which satisfy modern man especially in the Christian world. A regenerated person cannot watch this kind of infernal phenomena without utmost disgust.
If a regenerate man examines modern arts he will notice clear correspondences with infernal things. Compared with the old times’ art modern art is degenerated as man himself. Even modern music, classic and pop, is infernal. But one should bear in mind that there is a strong Jewish impact in art, in music and in entertainment industry and there cannot be a remedy in this matter without eliminating the impact of the Jewish hells.
6. Regarding the results of the present-day atheistic and materialistic sciences more genuine than the Heavenly Doctrine or some Swedenborg’s philosophical works. For example, the theories of relativity against Swedenborg’s theory of the ether or the third element of the world (Principia) and believing in the systematic cover-up of the results of the space and the moon research against Swedenborg’s Earths in the Universe. The Swedenborgian scientists do not notice sufficiently the impact of the atheistic and materialistic philosophy of sciences which produces many kinds of false theories and doctrines.
Without the understanding of the significance of the Secret Jewish World Power which I will expose in the Question four, one cannot comprehend that our planet’s science also is under the control of this power especially in the domains as the theories of relativity and the space and the moon research. Now I will first treat the theories of the relativity and show that their widespread acceptance is not on account of physics but of social psychology.
Michelson-Morley Experiment
After the development of Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism, several experiments were performed to prove the existence of ether and its motion relative to the earth. The most famous and successful was the one now known as the Michelson-Morley experiment, performed by Albert Michelson (1852-1931) and Edward Morley (1838-1923) in 1887.
Michelson and Morley built a Michelson interferometer, which essentially consists of a light source, a half-silvered glass plate, two mirrors, and a telescope. The mirrors are placed at right angles to each other and at equal distance from the glass plate, which is obliquely oriented at an angle of 45° relative to the two mirrors. In the original device, the mirrors were mounted on a rigid base that rotates freely on a basin filled with liquid mercury in order to reduce friction.
Prevailing theories held that ether formed an absolute reference frame with respect to which the rest of the universe was stationary. It would therefore follow that it should appear to be moving from the perspective of an observer on the sun-orbiting earth. As a result, light would sometimes travel in the same direction of the ether, and others times in the opposite direction. Thus, the idea was to measure the speed of light in different directions in order to measure speed of the relative to earth, as an ether wind, thus establishing the existence of the ether. This assumption itself proved simple-mindedness because nature never produces absolute straight-lined coordinates. But further:
Michelson and Morley were able to measure the speed of light by looking for interference fringes between the light which had passed through the two perpendicular arms of their measuring apparatus. These would occur since the light would travel faster along an arm if oriented in the “same” direction as the ether was moving, and slower if oriented in the opposite direction. Although Michelson and Morley were expecting measuring different speeds of light in each direction, they found no discernible fringes indicating a different speed in any orientation or at any position of the earth in its annual orbit around the sun.
In 1895 Lorentz concluded that the “null” result obtained by Michelson and Morley was caused by a effect of contraction made by the ether on their apparatus and introduced the length contraction equation. But now a Jewish physicist (A. Einstein) made a “revolutionary” solution to the problem: he replaced Lorentz’s interpretation of the contraction equation with idea of space-time contraction, and once and for all rejected the existence of ether. Einstein concluded that light travelled in the vacuum which filled the whole universe. Even a person with average intelligence can understand that a wave motion, as light is, cannot travel without some medium. What is a vacuum? If light goes in the vacuum it is not a vacuum. In the vacuum there is nothing, not even light. Einstein postulated that velocity of light is absolute and is not relative to the velocity of the observer. This is contrary to logic and cannot be true. Some other solution must be founded based on the odd quality of ether or ethers. One also must keep in mind that between air and ether is discrete relation: there is not a continuum from air to ether. That we cannot see, hear or sensate ether does not mean that there is no ether. Man also can draw conclusions from phenomena. And conclusions depend on man’s philosophical background. They are different with an atheist and with a person loving God. Only a person loving God can find the absolute truth.
This Einstein’s trick was a scientific hocus-pocus without a comparison in the history of sciences. Instead of starting to study characteristics of ether A. Einstein rejected ether and changed concepts of space and time with mathematical formulas discrediting at the same time also human intelligence and logic. This he called the special theory of relativity and this theory is proved to be absolute false for example by the so called “twin paradox”. In spite of this the theory is now generally accepted and “experimentally proved”. But those “proofs” come from the areas of electromagnetism, particle and nuclear physics and from cosmology and have nothing to do with space-time contraction as a universal physical law also related to solid bodies. Many famous physicists did not accept the theory, for example Philipp von Lenard (Nobel Prize in Physics 1905) and Johannes Stark (Nobel Prize in Physics 1919). Prof. Lenard assumed the existence of the ether from experimental proofs and proved A. Einstein’s theory to be false. His book Über Äther und Uräther, Leipzig 1922 (About Ether and Primary Ether) showed the way man ought to follow in order to solve the problems of electromagnetic waves. But it was international politics which now came into theoretical physics.
The Jews or better the Khazars had enormous power in the USA and in Europe at that time. In Germany Jewish professors dominated in many universities. One of the best experts in this question about the danger of the Jewish power was the great industrialist and humanitarian Henry Ford, Sr., who began to publish a research series about the Jews’ international power in his newspaper Dearborn Independent in 1920. Here is one of his writings:
”Judaism is the most closely organized power on earth. It forms a State whose citizens are unconditionally loyal wherever they may be and whether rich or poor. The name which is given to this State, which circulates among all the states, is “All-Judaan.”
The means of power of the State of All-Judaan are capital and journalism, or money and propaganda. All-Judaan is the only State that exercises world government; all the other States can and may exercise national government only.
The principal culture of All-Judaan is journalistic; the technical, scientific, literary performances of the modern Jew are throughout journalistic performances. They are due to the marvellous talent of the Jews for receptivity of others’ ideas. Capital and Journalism are joined in the Press to create a political and spiritual medium of Jewish power.
The government of this State of All-Judaan is wonderfully organized. Paris was the first seat, but has now been moved to a lower place. Before 1914 London was its first, and New York its second capital. New York now supplants London.
All-Judaan is not in a position to have a standing army and navy, other states supply these for it. It was the British Fleet which guarded from hindrance the progress of all-Jewish world economy, or that part of it which depends on the sea. In return, All-Judaan assured Britain an undisturbed political and territorial rule.
Then New York supplanted London. The drift of the Jews in the 19th century, expedited into a great flood after World War I, made the United States the seat of Jewish power and influence. ‘ America’, and her fleets, armies, citizens, takes the place of Britain as the ‘ruler of the world.’ It merely means that Jewry has moved from the British Empire to the American Continent.
All-Judaan is willing to entrust the government of various strips of the world to nationalistic governments; it only asks to control the governments. Judaism is passionately in favor of perpetuating nationalistic divisions for the Gentile world. For themselves, Jews never became assimilated with any nation. They are a separate people, always were and always will be.
All-Judaan's only quarrel with any nation occurs when that nation makes it impossible, or tries to make it so, for All-Judaan to control that nation’s industrial and financial profits. It can make war, it can make peace; it can command anarchy in stubborn cases, it can restore order. It holds the sinews of world power in its hand and it apportions them among the nations in such ways as will best support All-Judaan's plan.
Controlling the world's source of news, All-Judaan can always prepare the minds of the people for its next move. The greatest exposure yet to be made is the way that news is manufactured and the way in which the mind of whole nations is moulded for a purpose.
When the powerful Jew is at last traced and his hand revealed, then comes the ready cry of persecution and it echoes through the world press. The real cause of the persecution (which is the oppression of the people by the financial practices of the Jews) is never given publicity.
All-Judaan has its vice-governments in every capital. Having wreaked its vengeance on Germany, it will go forth to conquer other nations. Britain it already has. France and Russia it has long held. The United States, with its good-natured tolerance of all races, offered a promising field. All-Judaan is here. The scene of operations changes, but the Jew is the same throughout the centuries.”
So was the Jewish or Khazarian power at that time before the WW II. After that the secret Jewish power has grown vastly on account of the old and new media: films, radio, television and news agencies, which all are largely controlled by the Jews, and on account of the fact that they now have a state of their own, Israel, which is a dangerous military power and a threat to the world peace. But about this I will tell you more in the next question.
German scientists were the most qualified in the world in the twenties and thirties and there began a combat between German nationalism and Jewish world power. The result of this combat was the real cause of the victory of the ridicule special theory of relativity and the same kind of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. The Jews without doubt thought that they had enough power to stuff goyim with any kind of big lies. And today many physicists do know that these theories are nonsense but do not dare to speak it out because it would be a scientific suicide. On the contrary, everybody who tries to prove these theories with experimental facts in particle physics or with cosmological theories is awarded a prize for his stupidity. I do not accept German “National Socialism” because of its racism and the lack of Christian principles but the Judeo-Masonic victory of the WW II is the only reason for the position of the relativity theories today. The Nazis were just naughty schoolboys compared with the Zionists or the Talmudists who were real winners and mass murderers of the WW II.
I started to study theoretical physics in 1970 at the University of Helsinki. But I finished up soon because I did not accept the professor’s argument in the favour of the relativity theories. At the same time I was working as a secretary in the Finnish Mensa (a society for people with a high IQ) and found there many students in physics who did not accept relativity theories. I asked them about the theories later when they were graduated in physics but they were not interested in discussing the subject any more.
Above mentioned are proofs that acceptance of the theories of relativity of A. Einstein is not physics but a social psychological phenomenon. It also has a spiritual function. As the spiritual sense of the Word often concerns Christian Churches, the spiritual-celestial sense of the Word concerns the Jewish Church and the Jews in the present time as in Daniel 7: 25: “He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall be given into his hand for a time and times and half a time.” “To change times and law” means in the spiritual-celestial sense of the Word just the theories of relativity of the Jews and “for a time and times and half a time” means that these theories are prevailing until the beginning of the real New Church whose duty also is to create a new heavenly science opposite the infernal atheistic and Jewish science. The theories of relativity have blocked the development of theoretical physics for nearly one hundred years and hindered the solutions to the problems of ethers.
The problem of ether is in fact already partially resolved. The solution is found in Swedenborg’s Principia (The Principia; or, the First Principles of Natural Things, Being New Attempts toward a Philosophical Explanation of the Elementary World) in the First Part of Opera Philosophica et Mineralia. Ether is treated in the Chapter V in the III Part of the Principia: On the Ether or Third Element of the World. But if one wants to understand this chapter one must study carefully the earlier chapters, too. The Principia is a work so difficult that a Mensa IQ is not enough to grasp it. It is one of the most brilliant works of theoretical physics at all times. A person with average intelligence ought to read it many times in order to understand it. Swedenborg himself wrote in the beginning of this work:
“I am apprehensive lest, at the very outset of our philosophy, particularly its First Part, my readers should be deterred from proceeding further, when they meet with views which cannot but appear strange and foreign to those which are generally received; as also with such unusual phraseology as that of a Finite, an Active, an Elementary &c.; terms which are unknown in any our philosophical treatises; that is, which are not applied to the principles of mechanism, geometry, and the elementary world. For this reason it will be requisite, by way of preface, to present a general outline of our work, and key to its contents.”
The regenerated New Church scientists should conjoin the Principia to the modern knowledge of physics and create new microphysics without such theories as the theories of relativity and some other stupidities. I am sure of the fact that there are many kinds of micro worlds and ethers and the laws of these are not consisted with or compared with the physics of the solid bodies. I also suppose that on other planets there are ethers different from the ethers of our earth. Swedenborg tells us about three ethers from our material sun: the first from which is gravitation, the second from which is magnetism and the third, that is, the ether from which is light and electricity. Of course there also is the Divine Ether from which Providence is and which is outside of time and place but omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent. The regenerated young Swedenborgian physicists have a great challenge to deliver theoretical physics from the mishmash of modern theoretical physics. Substituting ethers for mathematical formulas indicates just stupidity. “Time dilation” cannot be anything else than a joke for an intelligent scientist. Man is not confined to the velocity of light. Man’s intelligence and logic can use the concept of the infinite velocity in thinking about physical phenomena and then even a person with average intelligence can be convinced that the time is absolute, not relative. In mathematics on can use the concept of the infinite, why not in physics? Relativity theories are of utmost positivism: observations are promoted to laws of nature. But reality is not the same as observations. The special theory of relativity is a matter of blind faith, not a matter of truth. There are not any proofs positive. All “proofs” are from particle or nuclear physics or from cosmology in which proofs always are accelerated motions (i.e. rotational motion) which motions cannot concern this theory. Swedenborg’s Principia is still the most brilliant work in the field of theoretical physics.
I have my suspicions that A. Einstein himself did not believe in his theories of relativity but got a lot of fun out of them. He was a Jew and Zionist, anyhow. There is no better way of satisfaction for a Jew than poisoning the whole planet with a big lie. The same did A. Einstein’s Zionist brother S. Freud in psychology. Both Einstein and Freud were members of the Jewish Freemason organization B’nai B’rith.
6. The notion that the results of present day atheistic and materialistic sciences are more genuine than the heavenly Doctrine or some Swedenborg’s philosophical works
Swedenborg’s work Earths in the Universe has been a stumbling block for many Swedenborgians and many believe that here Swedenborg was in error. They believe that today’s science has proved that there is not any life or there are at least not any human beings on other planets and on the moon. I myself am sure that Swedenborg was not wrong. I know with certainty that there are human beings on the moon and on all the other planets. But I cannot testify my intuitive perception for other people. However, I can expose some arguments in favour of Swedenborg’s descriptions.
A. You also in this matter ought to take account of the Secret Jewish World Government which I will treat in question 4. I have found out that theNASA has made systematic cover-ups of the results of the space and the moon research. Likewise the Roswell case in 1947 was covered up by the U.S. Government. The Jewish Intelligentsia controls the NASA almost totally. I suppose that this intelligentsia’s aim by the space research is to find a new planet where the Jews can lay the foundation of a new life for the Jewish (Khazarian) race after destroying our planet in a nuclear war. Therefore mankind ought to be kept unconscious of life on the moon and on other planets. This can sound strange but the nature of the Jewish policy is unbelievable. Somebody believes that man has not been on the moon because of the photographs claimed to have been taken on the moon are false. I suppose that those photographs were altered or faked due to the covering that there is life on the moon.
B. The Secret Jewish World Government also does not want to reveal to the general public that there are human beings on the moon and other planets because such a revelation could confuse people’s ideas and ideologies by confirming Swedenborg’s work Earths in the Universe and by this Swedenborg’s notion of the infernal nature of the Jews and their endeavours. So such a revelation could uncover and diminish their secret power.
C. The atmospheres and ethers of other planets differ very much from our own (for example magnetic fields as can be proved) and on every planet human beings and life are adapted to their own atmospheres and ethers. The light which we see forms a very narrow section of the electromagnetic spectrum and we see light only with wavelength range in nanometres about 400 (violet) to 720 (red). It is possible that on other planets wavelength range is different and we cannot see life there and that the inhabitants of other planets maybe cannot see life on our earth.
D. In the Grand Man mankind on every planet signifies some part of it, as we represent the natural and external sense. We cannot see our heart, lungs, liver, kidneys etc. and according to the science of correspondences some parts of the Grand Man are not visible to some other parts.
E. Mankind on our planet is very infernal one and Providence can protect people on other planets preventing contact with us. Knowledge of human beings on other planets could arouse here lust to conquer those planets as colonies and damage the spiritual and natural life of those people who maybe do not have so advanced technology than we have.
Swedenborgian people are not always noticed sufficiently the impact of the atheistic and materialistic philosophy of sciences prevailing in our universities. This philosophy produces many kinds of abnormalities such as extending the theory of evolution to relate to man: the assumption that man is a descendant of apes. The evolution theory as such is correct concerning nature. But with man the process of evolution is different. Man is a member of two kingdoms. One part is natural which follow the law of nature as with animals. But the other part is a citizen of the spiritual kingdom which does not follow natural but spiritual laws. Man has soul but animals do have not. There also are animals in the spiritual world but they are merely correspondences.
An atheistic view that man has developed from animals is logic only in the light of atheism and by people who do not know that there are continuous and discrete degrees. Physical body and human spirit have a discrete relation between each other. This proves that from an animal can never develop a being with soul because the soul is not a result of developing from body but another discrete entity which only corresponds to the body. In the light of the Divine Word and the Writings this is absolutely true. Swedenborg’s descriptions of people of old (Conjugial Love, 75-81) do not show evolution but devolution. Animals cannot degenerate like man; they can only adapt to changes in environment or become extinct. That man can degenerate spiritually we can just see in looking at the last fifty years of our worldly life. But can man also degenerate physically?
Swedenborg wrote in the Doctrine of the Sacred Scripture, n. 116: ”I have been permitted to see peoples who had been born in remote islands, who were rational in respect to civil matters, but had known nothing whatever about God. In the spiritual world such appear like apes, and their life is very similar to that of apes.” Is there a possibility that God created first an ape with evolution and after that blew spirit or soul into it? But so the first man should have had a hairy coat for to have survived without spirit and rational intelligence which an animal does not have. But some archaeological discoveries prove that the first men did not have a total hairy coat like present-day apes. So the first men begin to use clothes and gradually lost the hairy coat. But this is nonsense. The only solution is that after God had created man by a miraculous way some men separated out of human society and after a long time lost their contact with the spirits and angels and became animals that live only with universal influx from the spiritual world. The change from man to animal could not have been gradual or continuous but God should have taken away the soul from man because man would not have been able to regenerate any longer after living thousands of years without religion. God even destroys nations who cannot any more be regenerated as man can read from the Word and what one can expect concerning the Jewish nation. Man’s and chimpanzee’s genotype is so similar that they probably have a common ancestor. From the point of view of atheism, it is a primary ape, from the point of view of the Heavenly Doctrine it is man himself. Maybe a chimpanzee is a warning for man that man ought to believe in God and follow His laws.
Swedenborg wrote in Apocalypse Revealed, n. 839: “I looked forth into the world of spirits, and saw an army upon red and black horses. They that sat upon them appeared like apes, with their faces and breasts turned towards the loins and tails of the horses, and with the backs of their heads and their backs towards the necks and heads of the horses; and the reins hung around the necks of the riders. And they cried out, ’Let us fight against them that ride upon the white horses.’ And they pulled the reins with both hands, and thus pulled back the horses from the fight; and this continually. Then two angels descended from heaven, and drew near to me, and said, ’What do you see?’ And I related that I saw this ludicrous company of horsemen, and asked what it was, and who they were. [2] And the angels answered, ’They are from the place which is called Armageddon (Rev. 16:16), where they have been gathered together to the number of some thousands, to fight against those who are of the Lord’s New Church, which is called the New Jerusalem. They spoke in that place concerning the church and religion; and yet there was not anything of the church with them, because there was not any spiritual truth; nor anything of religion, because there was not any spiritual good. They spoke there on both subjects with the mouth and with the lips, but for the reason that by means of them they might have dominion. They learned in their youth to confirm faith alone, the Trinity of God, and the duality of Christ; and when they were promoted to more eminent offices in the church, they retained those things for some time; but as they then began to think no more about God and heaven, but about themselves and the world, and thus not about eternal happiness and felicity, but about temporal eminence and opulence, they rejected the doctrinals acquired in their youth from the interiors of the rational mind, which communicate with heaven, and hence are in the light of heaven, into the exteriors of the rational mind, which communicate with the world, and hence are only in the light of the world; and at length they thrust them down into the sensual natural; whence the doctrinals of the church have become with them things of the mouth only, and are no longer of the thought from reason, and still less of the affection from love; and because they have made themselves such, they do not admit any genuine truth which is of the church, nor any genuine good which is of religion. The interiors of their minds have become comparatively like bottles filled with iron filings mixed with powdered sulphur, into which if water be poured, there first arises a heat, and afterwards a flame, by which the bottles are burst. In like manner, when they hear anything about living water, which is the genuine truth of the Word, and this enters through the ears, they are violently heated and inflamed, and reject it as a thing that would burst their heads. [3] These are they who appeared to you like apes riding, with the body turned round, upon red and black horses, with the reins around their necks; since they who do not love the truth and the good of the church from the Word, will not look at the forward parts of any horse, but at his hinder parts; for 'a horse' signifies the understanding of the Word; 'a red horse' the understanding of the Word destroyed as to good, and 'a black horse' the understanding of the Word destroyed as to truth. The reason why they cried out to fight against those riding upon the white horses is that 'a white horse' signifies the understanding of the Word as to truth and good. They were seen to pull back the horses by their necks, because they feared the combat, lest the truth of the Word should come to many, and so into the light. This is the interpretation.”
The history above tells us that the opponents of the New Church appear like apes in the spiritual world. These opponents have been atheists and especially scientists who were formally members of Christian churches but did not believe in the Word and its holiness. Without the New Church our planet would be a planet of apes in some thousands of years. High technology does not help man to be spiritual. Without correct religion this planet would be a planet of apes but a planet with much higher technology as we have now. And a correct religion cannot be another than the New Church Doctrine which is the only religion that can encompass a high technology, too. Above mentioned points out that apes signify man’s endeavour to turn away from God. If this endeavouring lasts very long time, it could produce an ape from man also biologically.
The sciences and especially the philosophy of sciences are very important for the New Church. The New Church shall begin with people of high education and intelligence unlike the earlier Churches whose members were simple and unsophisticated as for example fishermen. Swedenborg anticipated this. In the letter to Dr. Gabriel Beyer (February 1767) he wrote: “How soon is a New Church to be expected? Answer: The Lord is now preparing a new heaven of those who believe in Him and acknowledge Him as the true God of heaven and earth, and likewise look up to Him in their lives, which means the shunning of what is evil and the doing of what is good; for it is from this heaven that the New Jerusalem is to come down (Apoc. 21:2). I see daily spirits and angels descending and ascending to the number of from 10 to 20.000 and being set in order. Gradually, as that heaven is formed, so the New Church commences and increases. The universities in Christendom are now first being instructed, and from them come new priests; for the new Heaven has no influence with the old, which keeps itself too learned in justification by faith alone.”
I think that this kind of activity already has begun. I mean the non-atheistic philosophy of sciences called “Theistic science” by Dr. Ian J. Thompson and Dr. Leon James: Theistic Science, a branch of each theoretical science, derives general theoretical principles from the laws transmitted through scientific revelations from God. (http://www.theisticscience.org/index.htm ). However, I cannot accept all the articles of Mr. Thompson and of Mr. James. The latter claims that “anti-Semitism” is a product of an unregenerated man. This is nonsense because the present-day Jews are not Semitic but Khazarian people. The better regenerated man is, the deeper is his disgust of Judaism. Anyhow, the atheistic philosophy of sciences produces ridicule theories which has nothing to do with real scientific truths. The present-day average man trusts completely in the sciences which have collected immense measure of facts and developed ingenious appliances. But the fact is that an atheistic and materialistic science goes farther and farther from the truth. |
